Why article submission and spinner software are junk

by Alan S. 29. May 2010 17:41

We’ve had a chance over the last few years to try out a lot of different marketing schemes and tricks to get higher Google rankings, including auto submitters. One of the ways to get your site listed higher in the major search engines is to create a number of external links that point back to your landing page. In it’s day, mass article submitters worked great, but nowadays it seems they are just a waste.

 

The problem is that the major search engines have caught on to the trick of mindlessly submitting your article to hundreds of link and article submission sites. What they look for now is that each article be different. If not, the submission is not only discarded, but can count against your overall page ranking. Thus was born the companion piece to mass article submitters, the article spinner.

 

The concept behind this software is that it takes your base article and looks for synonyms to words that are in it’s database. That way every time the article is spun, it is worded differently than the original and will thus count as a positive back link to your landing page. The problem is that these ‘newly worded’ articles can make you sound like a dumb-ass. While you may be able to sneak your new article into a directory and have it count for Google, the result may be that the reader will be so turned off by your abysmal writing that they will look for a more ‘credible’ source. And once you lose your credibility, they won’t follow you again.

 

The other problem is stop words. Stop words are extremely common words that search engines ignore when indexing pages, calculating relevancy and when interpreting a search query prior to pulling pages from their indices. By simply switching stop words for example ‘this’ to ‘those’ will make no difference to the way a search engine views a page.

This is obviously a very simple example but when you consider that on average 40% of the words in any document are stop words it illustrates that Google will only consider approximately 60% of any document when calculating how unique it is is. Also consider that in order to create documents that are readable, even those created by article spinning, this percentage of stop words has to be maintained.

 

Article spinning cannot address this problem and in-fact may make things worse. Article spinning is a weak attempt to game search engine algorithms and as such should be used with care if used at all.


Comments (4) -

James
James United States
6/2/2010 3:34:25 AM #

I can argue on the point that auto submission software is junk, I am using it for a year to promote my sites on web, and so far everything goes good, I am submitting to a 50k database of directories.

Reply

Al
Al United States
6/28/2010 5:39:08 AM #

I would have to say that in their day, the spinners were pretty good. It seems that lately during our tests that the way in which sentences become restructured makes your post seem like it was written at a much lower grade level.

If you found an article spinner that works, please reply and let us know. We'll take a look and if it works well, we'll post an article!

Thanks for the comment!

Reply

sivan
sivan India
8/15/2010 3:20:53 AM #

YA they are considered as junk..

Reply

erp crm software
erp crm software United States
8/29/2010 11:04:44 PM #

I like reading your articles. I absolutely enjoyed every little bit of it. I have you bookmark your blog to check out the new stuff in future.

Reply

Add comment

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Month List

Who's Watchin' Me?


Lean Optimizer


Krill D3 Antioxidant Formula




Over 10,000 costumes and accessories from HalloweenMart




High quality yoga accessories at great prices!